© 2024 The Publiks Group ™ | All Rights Reserved
Founding | Governing | Ethics | Faith | Policies

Founding

Introduction

The founding of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group has been at the behest and impetus of the Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, and has proceeded as follows:

Founding History

Section 1.1.0. The Publiks Group was established:

1.1.1. Founding Division
in 2021 by its sole Founder, Owner and CEO, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, as a division of The Alvan Ikoku Group LLC, itself similarly established in 2019.
1.1.2. Founding Entities
as part of ongoing work he has carried out for over three decades, leading also to his founding of The Ikoku Charitable Trusts, The Ikoku Foundations, Publiks Inc, and Humana Sancta.
1.1.3. Founding Corporation
with its divisional partner, Publiks Inc, established in 2017, also by its sole Founder, Owner andPresident, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.
1.1.4. Founding Fulfillments
with the understanding that, where appropriate and authorized solely by the Founder, these distinct and independent entities will endeavor to coordinate efforts toward the fulfillment of their respective missions and purposes.

Founding Concerns

Section 1.2.0. Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group were also founded and developed in response to the concerns below:

1.2.1. Concern for Care
the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to care.
1.2.2. Concern for Creativity
the Founder’s longstanding concern for practices, problems, and products of creativity.
1.2.3. Concern for Community
the Founder’s longstanding concern for communities, both local and global in nature.
1.2.4. Concern for Ethics
the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to ethics.
1.2.5. Concern for Humanity
the Founder’s longstanding concern for the human and humane, and attendant concern regarding de- and subhumanizing conduct and resulting instances of inhuman and inhumane treatment, with the Founder’s insights from such concern proving valuable during several periods, preceding and during the formation of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group, where he was subject to inhumane conduct and treatment that entailed persistent, pervasive and profound violations of the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and, ultimately, sanctity of his being, body, and brain, as well as self, soul, and spirit.*

*for further, see Inhumane Conduct section below.

1.2.6. Concern for Indifference
the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to difference, with the Founder’s insights from such concern proving valuable during the aforementioned periods of inhuman and inhumane conduct and treatment, with such insights elucidating that — as also experienced by others — such inhumane conduct and treatment depend upon and employ notions of human and perceived difference (including those pertaining to ability, birth, caste, citizenship, culture, ethnicity, gender, medical information, origin, race, religion, and sex) to elicit active and passive indifference as well as support for persistent, pervasive and profound violations of a person’s humanness.
1.2.7. Concern for Spirituality
the Founder’s longstanding concern for the spiritual nature of humans, with further insights from such concern emanating in response to the aforementioned periods, as well as past and present difficulties, even failures of prevailing forms of civics, commerce, education, law, politics, public discourse, and religion to provide a meaningful ethical and moral basis for a good life in contemporary society, one adequate for ensuring the basic human and humane coexistence as well as spiritual and theological equanimity of diverse human beings living in shared societies.
1.2.8. Concern for Vulnerability
the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to lessening intractable problems and undue burdens experienced by vulnerable populations due to the aforementioned conduct and treatment, failures to prevent or remedy them, and the limits of processes that privilege majoritarian decision-making, interests, social structures, and views within a given community, institution, or polity.

Founding Mission

Section 1.3.0. Publiks Inc’s and The Publiks Group’s founding mission and purposes are therefore:

1.3.1. To Foster
to foster care and creativity, community and ethics in lives and societies of enduring concern to the Founder.
1.3.2. To Serve
to serve a range of communities touched by the Founder, including through disciplines in which he has trained and practiced.
1.3.3. To Fulfill
to fulfill its mission and purposes as a faith-aligned company, abiding by the basic principles and practices of the Humana Sancta Faith (the “Humana Faith” and “Sancthumanism”).
1.3.4. To Succeed
and to succeed in developing a company — as well as communities — where the aforementioned inhuman and inhumane conduct and treatment are considered incompatible with their principles and values as well as basic civility, decency, dignity and society, and so do not become or remain the means for any act or activity, benefit or good, product or service, mission or purpose.

Section 1.3.5. And Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group serve as divisional partners, within The Alvan Ikoku Group LLC, both tasked with:

1.3.6. Public Awareness
to enhance public awareness about and among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
1.3.7. Public Dialogue, Discourse
to enhance public dialogue and discourse about and among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
1.3.8. Public Education
to enhance public education about and among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
1.3.9. Public Information
to enhance public information about and among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
1.3.10. Public Knowledge
to enhance public knowledge about and among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
1.3.11. Public Relations
foster local and global public relations and relationships among people, communities, and societies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australasia, and Europe.
Close Up of Sharpened Heads of Multi-Colored Pencils
Audience, Lajeado, Brasil (Lucas George Wendt)

Focus

Provision

Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group have also been developed, and their activities and administration focused, as follows:

Activities and Administration

Section 1.5.0. All acts, activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, assets, and equivalent of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group are administered solely via the Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, and solely via the Founder’s authorization, as provided for in the Codes and Policies, and thus focused to ensure their alignment with and furtherance of the mission and purposes of the corporation and company division. Accordingly, Publiks Inc’s and The Publiks Group’s administration is conducted solely via means limited by the organizations’s entity status as

1.5.1. Faith-Aligned
a faith-aligned corporation and a faith-aligned division in a faith-aligned company.
1.5.2. For-Profit
a for-profit corporation and a for-profit division in a for-profit company.
1.5.3. Independent
an independent corporation and division in an independent company.
1.5.4. Non-Governmental
a non-governmental corporation and a non-governmental division in a non-governmental company.
1.5.5. Non-Political, -Partisan
a non-political and non-partisan corporation and a non-political and non-partisan division in a non-political and non-partisan company.
1.5.6. Non-Public, Private
a non-public and private corporation and a non-public and private division in a non-public and private company.
1.5.7. Single-Interestholder
with respect to The Publiks Group specifically, a division in a limited liability company whose interests are wholly held and owned by its sole Member and Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.
1.5.8. Single-Member
with respect to The Publiks Group specifically, a division in a single-member company, wholly owned by its sole Member and Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.
1.5.9. Single-Shareholder
with respect to Publiks Inc specifically, a corporation whose shares of stock are wholly held and owned by its sole Shareholder and Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.

Areas and Efforts

Section 1.6.0. As further described in the Divisional Areas, Publiks administers its efforts via five (5) areas of focus:

1.6.1. Publiks Education
Publiks Education
1.6.2. Publiks Information
Publiks Information
1.6.3. Publiks Media
Publiks Media
1.6.4. Publiks Products | Services
Publiks Products | Services
1.6.5. Publiks Research | Design | Development
Publiks RD&D

Faith and Spirituality

Section 1.7.0. Publiks Inc’s and The Publiks Group’s faith-based commitments are focused as follows:

1.7.1. Humana Faith
that none of their acts, activities, agents, arrangements, or equivalent may in any way come in conflict with the Humana Sancta Faith (the “Humana Faith” and “Sancthumanism”) as such faith is administered, defined and interpreted solely by Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, serving also as sole Founder and Presiding Officer of Humana Sancta.
1.7.2.1. Sanctity of Human, As-Is
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief in the sanctity of each human being as-is.
1.7.2.2. Sanctity of Human, Body
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s inner being, brain, and body — as well as attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.
1.7.2.3. Sanctity of Human, Spirit
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s inner self, soul, and spirit — as well as attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.
1.7.2.4. Sanctity of Human, Thoughts
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s thoughts and mental activities, functions, and tasks, whether conducted in silence or voiced in solitude — and attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.
1.7.2.5. Sanctity of Human, Will
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s will as to own consciousness, conscience, consent, as well as person — and attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus to be fully respected.
1.7.3. Sanctity of Protection
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith include a faith-based commitment to protect against any infringement of the aforementioned beliefs and rights, including protection against any diminishment of a human’s humanness, humaneness, or humanity, or status and treatment as an equal and full human being as-is.
1.7.4. Sanctity of Provision
that such nonconflict with the Humana Faith include a faith-based commitment to provide for the aforementioned beliefs and rights, resulting in their highest possible level of spiritual and substantive enjoyment, for the Founder and every follower of Humana Sancta, worthy of the respect their humanity requires.

Incompatibility with Founding

Section 1.8.0. The activities, agents, and arrangements of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group are therefore focused and limited via determinations of incompatibility with the corporation and company division, as delineated below:

1.8.1. Notwithstanding Proviso
firstly, notwithstanding any provision of applicable law or regulation, the Codes and Policies, or any equivalent founding or legal documents, no act, activity, agent, arrangement, or equivalent of Publiks Inc or The Publiks Group may
1.8.1.1. Notwithstanding, Infringement, Founding
effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the Founding of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group or the Governance of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group, as described in the Codes and Policies (respectively, the “Founding” and the “Governance”).
1.8.1.2. Notwithstanding, Infringement, Faith
effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments.
1.8.1.3. Notwithstanding, Infringement, Policy
effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the Codes and Policies.
1.8.1.4. Notwithstanding, Inhumane Conduct
effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.1.5. Notwithstanding Nonpreclusion
with the understanding that the lawfulness, perceived benefit, or equivalent consideration of a given act, activity, agent, arrangement, or equivalent does not preclude its incompatibility or its infringing, inhumane or equivalent nature in relation to Publiks Inc or The Publiks Group, which is to be determined solely by the Founder.
1.8.2. Adjudication of Incompatibility
thus, secondly, any such infringing or inhumane activity, agent, or arrangement — as well as any advantage, benefit, information, or property attributed to it — is to be adjudicated solely by the Founder as incompatible with Publiks Inc or The Publiks Group itself as well as its founding, governance, and overall administration.
1.8.3. Determinations of Incompatibility
thus, thirdly, each activity, agent, and arrangement relating to Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group is subject to determinations of incompatibility further delineated below, namely,
1.8.3.1. Determination, Incompatibility, Activities
where the Founder determines that an act or activity effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.2. Determination, Incompatibility, Agents
where the Founder determines that an agent effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.3. Determination, Incompatibility, Arrangements
where the Founder determines that an arrangement effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.4. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Natural
where the Founder determines that a natural person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.5. Determination, Example of Persons, Natural
as has been determined, among natural persons, in the cases of Eleanor Marie Brown (AB, Brown; JD, Yale) of Jamaica and the United States of America; Rafael Nadal Parera of Manacor, Mallorca, Spain; Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro of Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; and Jeff Williams of Telegraph Hill, San Francisco, California, United States of America;
1.8.3.6. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Legal
where the Founder determines that a legal person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.7. Determination, Example of Persons, Legal
as has been determined, among legal persons, in the cases of Leland Stanford Jr University of Palo Alto, California, United States of America and The New York Times Company of New York City, New York, United States of America;
1.8.3.8. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Political
where the Founder determines that a government, political, public or state authority, entity, office, or person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.8.3.9. Determination, Example of Persons, Political
as has been determined, among political persons, in the cases of Former President Barack Hussein Obama (AB, Columbia; JD, Harvard) of Honolulu, Hawaii and Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; and the Democratic Party of San Francisco, of California, and of the United States of America;
1.8.4. Incompatible, Unauthorized, Unqualified
thus, fourthly, subsequent to the Founder’s determination of incompatibility, such activity, agent, arrangement, or person is to be deemed unauthorized and unqualified — entailing, where applicable, the revocation of any authorization or qualification — to be an activity, agent, arrangement, or person of Publiks Inc or The Publiks Group, in any capacity, especially that pertaining to decision-making, leadership, membership, stakeholding, or voting, and in any way as part of its administration, or as a recipient of any assets, contract, funding, properties, support, work, or equivalent.
1.8.5. Incompatibility, Reporting, Informing Founder
and upon discovery by any person of any indication, instance, or possibility of incompatibility, such person must directly report to and fully inform the Founder of such issues.
1.8.6. Incompatibility, Sole Adjudicator, Founder
with the understanding that the Founder is the sole person with powers to conduct inquiries, investigations, and other proceedings regarding such issues and make adjudications and determinations of compatibility or incompatibility, confirmed and executed only via the Founder’s authorization.

Inhumane Behaviors

Section 1.9.0. The aforementioned inhumane conduct include the behaviors delineated below, properly understood to not only treat a person inhumanely but to also risk rendering the treater inhumane, and so they are to be absent from any and all acts, activities, agents, arrangements, and equivalent relating to Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group, and are not to be effected, facilitated or fostered in any way or via any manner, means, method, or mode, or to any degree:

1.9.1. Denial, Autonomy
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s autonomy, rights to autonomy, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of meaningful consent or decision-making for the self.
1.9.2.1. Denial, Confidentiality
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s confidentiality, rights to confidentiality, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for confidences or confidential acts, affairs, matters, relations, or services.
1.9.2.2. Denial, Confidentiality, Mind
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s confidentiality of mind and thought, rights to confidentiality of mind and thought, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for thinking confidentially, by, to or with oneself, whether in silence or voiced in solitude, with absolute confidentiality and thus without disclosure or dissemination.*
1.9.3. Denial, Dignity
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s dignity, rights to dignity, or protections of such — especially via public debasement or degradation, social excoriation or stripping.
1.9.4. Denial, Equality
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s consideration, recognition, and treatment as equally and fully human, and so deserving of a fundamental reciprocity — to not do to that person what is not done simultaneously to each and every human being, or what would not be done to oneself or one’s most loved one.
1.9.5.1. Denial, Freedom
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s freedom, rights to freedom, or protections of such — especially via any means of de facto or de jure enslavement, forced labor or indentured servitude.
1.9.5.2. Denial, Freedom, Mind
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s freedom of mind and thought, rights to freedom of mind and thought, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for thinking freely, by, to or with oneself, whether in silence or voiced in solitude, with absolute freedom and thus without coercion or hinderance.*
1.9.6.1. Denial, Liberty
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s liberty, rights to liberty, or protections of such — especially via any means of de facto or de juredisenfranchisement, arbitrary or undue imposition by a community or state.
1.9.6.2. Denial, Liberty, Mind
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s liberty of mind and thought, rights to liberty of mind and thought, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for thinking liberally, by, to or with oneself, whether in silence or voiced in solitude, with absolute liberty and thus without imposition or intrusion.*
1.9.7. Denial, Privacy
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s privacy, rights to privacy, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for private life or private acts, affairs, matters, relations, or services.
1.9.7.1. Denial, Privacy, Mind
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s privacy of mind and thought, rights to privacy of mind and thought, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for thinking privately, by, to or with oneself, whether in silence or voiced in solitude, with absolute privacy and thus without surreptitious detection or surveillance.*
1.9.8. Denial, Private Property, Work
the denial, diminishment, or infringement of a human being’s private property or work, rights to private property or work, or protections of such — especially via the preclusion of any possibility for personal or private labor, office or work space, opportunity or pursuit, remuneration or value.
1.9.9. Exhibition, Exposure
the exhibition or exposure of a human being — especially via a totalizing regime that provides other persons, even the greater public, an unconsented surfeit of access and information regarding the human being, while systemically withholding basic, fundamental and necessary information from the human for ceasing any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.9.10. Experimentation, Testing
the experimentation, research, or testing on a human being — especially for any benefits or purposes or via any means or methods that are not fully informed or unconsented.
1.9.11. Extortion, Ransom
the extortion or ransom of a human being.
1.9.12. Harassment, Stalking
the persistent or pervasive harassment, stalking, or tracking of a human being.
1.9.13. Harm, Injuring
the insistent or persistent physical, physiological or psychological abuse, harm, or injury of a human being.
1.9.14. Indifference, Cruel
the cruel or depravedly indifferent treatment of a human being — especially via maleficence, malfeasance, or malevolence meant to incur pain.
1.9.15. Isolation, Marginalization
the isolation or marginalization of a human being from humans — and vice versa — especially via any means of ostracizing or scapegoating, stigmatization or vilification.
1.9.16. Persecution, Prejudiced
the insistent or persistent persecution of a human being — especially for any aims or purposes or via any means or methods that are explicitly based on or motivated by bias, discrimination, prejudice, or equivalent.
1.9.17. Sporting, Toying
the sporting or toying with a human being — especially via any means of amusing or entertaining oneself, betting, chasing, competing, gambling, gaming, hunting, or racing against the unconsenting human.
1.9.18. Surveillance, Mind
the detection, dissemination, monitoring, policing, recording, reporting, surveillance, tracking, transmission, or equivalent of a human being’s thoughts and other activities, functions, and tasks of the brain and mind.*
1.9.19. Targeting, as Conditions
the targeting of a human being to make any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct a condition of advancement, affiliation, association, care, existence, learning, life, participation, research, service, support, training, wealth, work, or equivalent — especially where it is not such a condition for every other person.
1.9.20. Totalitarianism, Incremental
the enabling a community, polity, sector, or state to subject a human being to any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct, and thus incrementally instantiate forms of totalitarianism.
1.9.21. Tyranny, Majoritarian
the enabling a community or group to collectively, democratically or publicly choose, decide, or vote to have a human being be subjected to any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.
1.9.22. Use, Instrumentality
the instrumental use of a human being as means to others’s ends.
1.9.23. Utility, Utilitarianism
the utilitarian use or utility of a human being for the greater good or the increased or maximal gain of a community, field, or state.
*. Note
*with the understanding that protected activities, functions, and tasks of the brain and mind include, but are not limited to, those of cognition, communication, conscience, consciousness, dreaming, emotion, ideation, memory, perception, physiology, sensation, signaling, thought, and equivalent.

Intrinsic Refusals

Section 1.10.0. In light, therefore, of the aforementioned, incompatibility with Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group entails the following basic refusals, each intrinsic to the basic humanity, humanness, and humaneness of each human being, including the Founder, and to the respect such humanity requires:

1.10.1. Basic Refusal, Inhumane Conduct
that Publiks Inc, The Publiks Group, and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, assent, authorization, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.
1.10.2. Basic Refusal, Inhumane Use, Utility
that Publiks Inc, The Publiks Group, and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, authorization, assent, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any access or use of Publiks Inc, The Publiks Group, or Founder, or any of Publiks Inc’s, The Publiks Group’s, or the Founder’s activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, or assets, or being, body or brain, or self, soul, or spirit, or any equivalent, with the effect or intent of construing, employing or otherwise using the Founder — or any human being — instrumentally or utilitarianly, as a means or medium, for a greater good or to an end of another person or any association, community, field, group, polity, public, or society of persons, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.
1.10.3. Basic Refusal, Intrusive Access
that Publiks Inc, The Publiks Group, and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, assent, authorization, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any access to, entry or intrusion into, or recording or transmission of the administration of Publiks Inc, The Publiks Group, or Founder, or any of Publiks Inc’s, The Publiks Group’s, or the Founder’s activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, assets, or any equivalent, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.
1.10.4. Basic Refusals as Principle
that these three basic refusals — at once human and humane — together constitute a fundamental limiting and restricting principle, and wherever there is conflict or question, legally override and supersede any conflicting clause or interpretation of any alleged, assumed, construed, presumed or otherwise made or understood agreement, arrangement, article, assent, authorization, bylaw, choice, code, consent, contract, decision, guideline, law, license, order, permission, policy, principle, provision, regulation, right, term, vote, warrant, or equivalent.
Community (Pierre Basin)
Community (Pierre Basin)
Conversation (Shwetangi Gupta)
Conversation (Shwetangi Gupta)
Cast (Avi)
Cast (Avi)

Form

Provision

Publiks Inc’s and The Publiks Group’s organizational form is as delineated below:

Formation

Section 1.12.0. Publiks Inc is formally organized as a single-shareholder corporation, as provided for in the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, and it is registered and headquartered in San Francisco, CA. The divisional partnership is currently conducted via The Publiks Group, formally organized as a protected series of The Alvan Ikoku Group LLC — itself a series limited liability company — as provided for in the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, and it is registered and headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware.

Names

Section 1.13.0. The Publiks Group and Publiks Inc are, collectively, also officially known under the business name, Publiks. All three names, as used in official Ikoku Group and Publiks Group and Publiks Inc documents, products, programs, services and sites, refer to the same aforementioned divisional entity and corporation.

Divisions

Section 1.14.0. As provided for under law for series limited liability companies, The Ikoku Group uses its series as a means to structure its operations into the five (5) divisions and eight (8) areas of focus described in the main Areas and Divisions page. The five divisions are as follows:

1.14.1. Ikoku Corporation
Ikoku Corporation
1.14.2. Ikoku Holdings
Ikoku Holdings
1.14.3. Ikoku Services
Ikoku Services
1.14.4. Ikoku Philanthropies
Ikoku Philanthropies
1.14.5. Publiks Group
Publiks Group

Efforts

Section 1.15.0. The Ikoku Group, via its divisions, is thus structured to carry out efforts in the aforementioned areas, and to ultimately fulfill its founding mission to foster care and creativity, community and ethics in disciplines and among peoples of enduring concern to the Founder. As always, the objective is the improvement of lives and the betterment of societies.

Conclusion

— Conditions and Terms

— 1.16.1. All of the aforementioned in this section constitutes the Conditions and Terms of Founding of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group (the “Conditions and Terms of Founding” and “Conditions of Founding”) and forms an integral part of the Conditions and Terms of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group, the Codes and Policies of Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group, as well as the Publiks Conduct and Service Agreement you may enter into with Publiks Inc and The Publiks Group.

— Concerns and Questions

— 1.16.2. Please report any concerns about code or policy violations, and send any questions you may have regarding the Conditions of Founding or the Publiks Conduct and Service Agreement, to policies@publiks.org.

— Concluding

— 1.16.3. And as a concluding aviso and proviso, you are informed as well as reminded that by commencing or continuing any conduct or service relating to Publiks Inc or The Publiks Group — in any way, either directly or indirectly, and via any manner, means, method, or mode — you enter into the Publiks Conduct and Service Agreement and agree to abide by and be legally bound by the Policy conditions, principles, protections, and terms described above, and the Codes and Policies, in their entirety without modification or severability, as amended from time to time solely by the Founder.

Gathering (Pierre Basin)
Circle (Pierre Basin)
Circle (Pierre Basin)
Family (Taru Huhkio)
Family (Taru Huhkio)
Polity (Frank Castro)
Polity (Frank Castro)

Also at the Division

The Publiks Group and its parent company, The Ikoku Group, are dedicated to developing, providing, and safekeeping ideas and solutions — with the mission to foster care and community, culture and creativity, ethics and innovation in lives and societies. And so in accordance with the above, The Publiks Group and The Ikoku Group provide the following:

I.

A Company of Care and Community

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing ideas, practices, and products fostering care and community — for the benefit and service of people coexisting in local and global communities.

II.

A Company of Culture and Creativity

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing ideas, practices, and products fostering culture and creativity — for the benefit and enjoyment of people engaging in and with local and global communities.

III.

A Company of Ethics and Innovation

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing innovation that abides by ethics principles and protections — for the benefit and humane use of people employing our solutions for local and global concerns.

More About Us

Publiks Group & Inc

About Us • Founding • Governance

Creativity
Ethics
Community